Alana Subasic vs Ramu Ueda Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In recent months, Subasic has shown slightly better performance on their second serve, winning 36.24% of points compared to Ueda's 34.87%. Could this provide Subasic with a tactical edge?
• When it comes to returning their opponents' second serves, Ueda leads subtly by winning 55.63% of points, just above Subasic's 55.35%.
• Subasic has a slight advantage returning first serves, claiming 36.45% of points versus Ueda's 34.1%.
• Ueda demonstrates stronger resilience under pressure, saving 50% of breakpoints compared to Subasic's 42.7%.
• In terms of overall match records over the past year, Ueda has a better win rate at 56.52%, outperforming Subasic's 51.43%.
• Both players excel on Hard surfaces, but it is Subasic who presents a marginally better career win percentage of 55%.
• Subasic has been more successful in lower-tier tournaments, winning 69.57% of Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K events, while Ueda has a 56.25% success rate in similar competitions.
• The quality of opponents faced differs greatly, with Ueda challenging higher-ranked players, averaging 134.87, compared to Subasic’s opponents at an average rank of 377.66.
• In deciding sets, Ueda has a stronger performance, winning 50% of such scenarios, while Subasic has only won 33% when matches reach this critical stage.
• Ueda converts breakpoints more efficiently, at 41.46% compared to Subasic's 38.27%, indicating a slight advantage during crucial moments.

Editorial Prediction (August 5, 2025, UTC):

As the upcoming match approaches, we see a close contest emerging. Subasic shows stronger second serve performance, a crucial factor for imposing pressure on Ueda. However, Ueda's slightly superior return game statistics, particularly against second serves, could neutralize this advantage.

Ueda's resilience under pressure, notably in saving breakpoints and capitalizing on crucial opportunities to convert breaks, suggests a dependable set of skills that could pivot a tightly contested match to their favor. Furthermore, Subasic's advantage on Hard surfaces and success in lower-tier events may see challenges, given Ueda's experience with higher-ranked players.

The deciding factor might lean towards Ueda's ability to thrive in higher stakes, evidenced by a superior deciding set performance and diverse competitive experience. Therefore, based on the comparative stats and recent trends, Ueda appears more likely to prevail in this encounter.